1 edition of Evaluating eyewitness identification found in the catalog.
Evaluating eyewitness identification
Brian L. Cutler
Includes bibliographical references (p. 131-138) and index.
|Statement||Brian L. Cutler and Margaret Bull Kovera|
|Series||Best practices in forensic mental health assessment|
|Contributions||Kovera, Margaret Bull, 1966-|
|LC Classifications||KF9672 .C8678 2010|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xi, 149 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||149|
|LC Control Number||2009040535|
Eyewitness identification can be useful in the initial stages of an investigation to help narrow down the suspect pool. But sentencing a person to serve prison time or even worse death, based purely on eyewitness testimony in my opinion, is just plain wrong. Forensic science is by far more reliable than any eyewitness can be. Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Procedures Using ROC Analysis To date, the Innocence Project has used DNA evidence to exonerate over innocent people. Faulty eyewitness evidence played a significant role in nearly 75% of these wrongful convictions. As a result, eyewitness memory researchers have developed new lineup procedures.
Eyewitness identification can occur in several formats: a showup, live lineups, or a photo lineup. Showups —where a suspect is apprehended and shown “live” and in-person to a witness, close in time to the event—have been demonstrated to have higher percentages of both correct and incorrect identifications as compared to lineups. An in-court eyewitness identification of a perpetrator is incredibly powerful to a jury. In fact, with the exception of DNA evidence, nothing can be more damning for a defendant than a witness telling the jury that the defendant was at the scene and participated in the crime. But sometimes, a witness’s identification can be mistaken.
Watch Brain Games Eyewitness Identification - Sydney Redfield on Dailymotion. Search. Library. Read Evaluating Eyewitness Identification (Best Practices for Forensic Mental Health Assessments) PDF Brain Games #4 (Brain Games (Unnumbered)) pdf book free. Arantsarziririan. Trending. NFL Draft. NFL Draft Winners And Losers. - The psychology of eyewitness identification - Forensic Psychology: the Basics (search within book for "eyewitness testimony") - Forensic Psychology (Crighton & Towl, ch. 4) - Introduction to Forensic and Criminal Psychology (by Howitt - see chapter on eyewitness testimony) Click on the title of the book you would like to read >Author: Anthea Bonnici.
The Mitchell Beazley pocket guide to German wines
For ever England
An economic data logging system for field experiments
Measurement and evaluation
The coppie of a letter written to the Dvke of Bvckingham concerning the match with Spaine
IRS automobile recordkeeping regulations
Gymnastics in the primary school
Heraldry in war
Rate of toll on the Middlesex Canal, until further notice, April 4, 1808
From the Captains table
Personal engineering resource directory.
The processes and schools of engraving
The Orlando poems..
business vocabulary of representative terms.
Indo-Oriental genus Drupadia Moore (Lepidoptera , Lycaenidae)
Meanwhile, Evaluating Eyewitness Identification is an essential reference for any psychologist interested in testifying in court on eyewitness evidence."--PsycCRITIQUES. About the Author. Brian Cutler is a professor at the University of Ontario Institute of by: 6. Evaluating Eyewitness Identification book.
Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown in 5/5(1). Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Brian Cutler, Brian L. Cutler, Margaret Bull Kovera Oxford University Press, USA, - Psychology - pages.
Evaluating eyewitness identification. [Brian L Cutler; Margaret Bull Kovera] Print book: EnglishView all This volume deals with the issues involved in evaluating eyewitness testimony. In making recommendations for best practice, authors consider empirical support, legal relevance.
Meanwhile, Evaluating Eyewitness Identification is an essential reference for any psychologist interested in testifying in court on eyewitness evidence."—PsycCRITIQUES. From the Publisher. Customer Reviews. Barnes & Noble Press. Publish your book with B&N. Learn : Oxford University Press.
Evaluating Eyewitness Identification (Best Practices for Forensic Mental Health Assessments) - Kindle edition by Cutler, Brian, Bull Kovera, Margaret. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets.
Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Evaluating Eyewitness Identification (Best Practices for Forensic Mental Health Assessments).4/5(1).
Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Brian Cutler and Margaret Bull Kovera Access to the complete content on Oxford Clinical Psychology requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a : Brian Cutler.
Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines.
This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA. The 19 topical volumes address best approaches to practice for particular types of evaluation in the criminal, civil, and juvenile/family areas.
Get this from a library. Evaluating eyewitness identification. [Brian L Cutler; Margaret Bull Kovera] -- Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and.
Eyewitness testimony is the account a bystander or victim gives in the courtroom, describing what that person observed that occurred during the specific incident under investigation. Ideally this recollection of events is detailed; however, this is not always the case. This recollection is used as evidence to show what happened from a witness' point of view.
chapter 3 the law governing eyewitness identification evidence chapter 4 how memory works and affects witness accuracy chapter 8 jurors’ and others’ beliefs about eyewitness testimony chapter 9 evaluating the eyewitness case chapter 10 pretrial proceedings in criminal cases publish your book with b&n.
Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Brian Cutler and Margaret Bull Kovera Best Practices for Forensic Mental Health Assessments. Part of the successful Best Practices in Forensic Mental Health Assessment series ; User-friendly format and design for on-the-spot reference ; Provides an overview of the most up-to-date legal and psychological.
Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification makes the case that better data collection and research on eyewitness identification, new law enforcement training protocols, standardized procedures for administering line-ups, and improvements in the handling of eyewitness identification in court can increase the chances that.
Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Brian Cutler (Author), Margaret Bull Kovera (Author) Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA.
The 19 topical volumes address best approaches to practice for particular. the issue of evaluating eyewitness testimony by fact finders, that is, police officers, jurors or judges.
Although the tasks and responsibilities of these different groups of. This volume provides a tutorial review and evaluation of scientific research on the accuracy and reliability of eyewitness identification.
The book starts with the perspective that there are a variety of conceptual and empirical problems with eyewitness identification as a form of forensic evidence, just as there are a variety of problems with. Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and File Size: 1MB.
The testimony of eyewitness identification experts can aid jurors in understanding the psychology of mistaken identifications, but jurors ultimately have to try to decipher the accuracy of an identification on their own.
Given what we know about the vagaries of eyewitness ID, this can be a difficult task. Evaluating Eyewitness Identification Procedures: ROC Analysis and its Misconceptions In a mock crime study, the relative diagnostic accuracy of competing eyewitness identification procedures is usually based on an analysis of correct and false identification (ID).
As one recent book noted, "Ever since the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Wade [ U.S.()] took note of Wall's book on eyewitness identification, literature on the subject has come forth in a flood." E. ARNOLDS, W. CARROLL, M. LEWIS, & M. SENG, EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY: STRATE.
REFERENCE: Cutler BL, Kovera MB. Evaluating eyewitness identification. Oxford New York, NY: University Press, Inc.,pp. Eyewitness testimony plays a critical role in criminal trials, as the testimony provided by witnesses makes a significant impact on the jurors and can contribute to a guilty verdict.
However, there are myriad factors that may distort the memory and/or later. Because conducting proper eyewitness interviews and identification procedures is essential to reducing eyewitness error, legal systems should view eyewitness evidence as a type of trace evidence, like DNA or blood evidence.
Consequently, the use of scientific procedures in producing eyewitness evidence should be an important factor in Cited by: 4.2.
Criticism #2: Eyewitness identification ROCs are fundamentally different than ROCs in diagnostic medicine. ROC analysis is widely used in diagnostic medicine, but one might imagine that trying to use the same approach in eyewitness identification is problematic because Cited by: